LLexfolio

Evidence Act to BSA Conversion Table: Old vs New Sections

Evidence Act to BSA Conversion Table: Old vs New Sections

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) on 1 July 2024. Key pairs: Section 65B (electronic records) is now Section 63 BSA, Section 27 (discovery) is the proviso to Section 23, Section 32 (dying declaration) is Section 26, Section 45 (experts) is Section 39, and Section 115 (estoppel) is Section 121. The tables below map the key sections and flag every real change.

The BSA has 170 sections against 167 in the old Act. Its structure and most of its wording follow the 1872 Act closely, so the old case law on relevancy, confessions and burden of proof still applies. The real changes are concentrated in electronic evidence, secondary evidence and a few clean-ups of colonial references.

Definitions and relevancy of facts

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
32Definitions (court, fact, document, evidence, proved, disproved)“Document” and “evidence” now expressly include electronic and digital records and statements given electronically
53Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts
64Facts forming part of the same transaction (res gestae)
86Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct
108Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design
119When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant (plea of alibi)

Admissions and confessions

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
1715Admission defined
2422Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise, when irrelevant
2822 (first proviso)Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducementMerged into Section 22 as a proviso
2922 (second proviso)Confession otherwise relevant not to become irrelevant because of promise of secrecy, etc.Merged into Section 22 as a proviso
2523(1)Confession to police officer not to be proved
2623(2)Confession while in police custody not to be proved unless before a Magistrate
2723 (proviso)How much of information received from accused may be proved (discovery)Now a proviso to Section 23, not a separate section
3024Confession of co-accused in joint trialNew Explanation: trial of an accused who has absconded or failed to comply with a proclamation is treated as a joint trial

Statements by persons who cannot be called, and opinion evidence

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
3226Statements by persons who are dead or cannot be found (including dying declaration in 32(1))Dying declaration is now in 26(a)
4539(1)Opinions of expertsExpert fields extended to “any other field”
45A39(2)Opinion of Examiner of Electronic Evidence
4741(1)Opinion as to handwriting
53A48Character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain cases

Oral, documentary and electronic evidence

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
6156Proof of contents of documents
6257Primary evidenceNew Explanations: an electronic record stored in multiple files, produced from proper custody, or simultaneously stored, is primary evidence
6358Secondary evidenceNow also includes oral admissions, written admissions and evidence of a person skilled in examining voluminous documents
6560Cases in which secondary evidence may be given
None61Electronic or digital record not to be denied admissibility only on that groundNew
65A62Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record
65B63Admissibility of electronic records (certificate)Certificate must accompany the record each time it is produced, in the form in the Schedule (Part A by the party, Part B by an expert); covers devices, networks and intermediaries
6765Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document
7474(1)Public documents
7574(2)Private documentsMerged with public documents into one section
8180Presumption as to Gazettes, newspapers and private ActsReferences to the London Gazette and colonial gazettes removed
9092Presumption as to documents thirty years old

Burden of proof and presumptions

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
101104Burden of proof
102105On whom burden of proof lies
103106Burden of proof as to particular fact
105108Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions
106109Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge
113A117Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman
113B118Presumption as to dowry death
114119Court may presume existence of certain facts
114A120Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecutions for rape
113No equivalentProof of cession of territoryDeleted

Estoppel and privileged communications

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
115121Estoppel
122128Communications during marriage
126, 127132Professional communications with legal advisers; extends to interpreters and clerksMerged into one section
129134Confidential communications with legal advisers

Witnesses, examination and impeaching credit

Evidence Act sectionBSA sectionProvisionNote on change
118124Who may testify
119125Witness unable to communicate verbally
132137Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate
133138Accomplice
134139Number of witnesses
135140Order of production and examination of witnesses
137142Examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination
138143Order of examinations
141, 142, 143146Leading questions: meaning, when they must not be asked, when they may be askedThree sections merged
145148Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing
154157Question by party to his own witness (hostile witness)
155158Impeaching credit of witness
165168Judge’s power to put questions or order production
166No equivalentPower of jury or assessors to put questionsDeleted, as jury trials no longer exist
167169No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence

What really changed

Electronic evidence is now mainstream

The BSA treats electronic records as documents in the definition itself, and Section 61 says such a record cannot be refused only because it is electronic. Section 57 makes several kinds of stored electronic records primary evidence, which means the original device need not always be produced.

The new certificate under Section 63

The old 65B certificate was a single document with no fixed format. Section 63(4) now requires a certificate in the form set out in the Schedule each time an electronic record is offered. Part A is signed by the person producing the record and Part B by an expert, and the form asks for details such as the hash value. In Pune Bar Association v. Union of India (May 2026), the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to Section 63(4) and held that Part B may be signed by any person the court accepts as an expert in computer science and cyber forensics under Section 39, not only by an Examiner notified under Section 79A of the IT Act.

Secondary evidence widened

Section 58 adds oral and written admissions, and the evidence of a person who has examined documents too voluminous to be examined in court, to the list of secondary evidence.

Colonial clean-up

References to the London Gazette, British Parliament and the Crown have been removed, Section 113 (cession of territory) and Section 166 (jury questions) are gone.

Leading cases that still govern

Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor (1946, Privy Council): under Section 27, only that part of the statement which distinctly relates to the fact discovered is admissible. It now applies to the proviso to Section 23 BSA.

Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor (1939, Privy Council): explained “circumstances of the transaction” for dying declarations. It now governs Section 26(a) BSA.

Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) and Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020): the Supreme Court held that the 65B(4) certificate is a condition precedent for admitting secondary electronic evidence. The same logic is carried into Section 63 BSA.

Common confusions

Section 27 has no number of its own now. Write “proviso to Section 23 BSA”, not “Section 27 BSA”. Section 27 BSA is the old Section 33 on evidence in earlier proceedings.

Section 65B is not 65 BSA. It is Section 63. Section 65 BSA deals with proof of signature and handwriting.

Section 32 BSA is not the dying declaration. Dying declaration is Section 26. Section 32 BSA is the old Section 38 on statements of law in books.

Exam angle

  • The BSA has 170 sections. Section 170 is the repeal and savings clause.
  • Confession block: 22 (inducement, with old 28 and 29 as provisos), 23 (police confession, with old 27 as proviso), 24 (co-accused).
  • Burden of proof shifts by three: 101 to 104, 102 to 105, 103 to 106, 105 to 108, 106 to 109.
  • Presumption block shifts by four or five: 113A to 117, 113B to 118, 114 to 119, 114A to 120, 115 to 121.
  • Electronic evidence: 2 (definition), 57 (primary), 61 (new), 62 (old 65A), 63 (old 65B), 39(2) (old 45A).

Frequently asked questions

What is Section 65B of the Evidence Act in BSA?

Section 63 BSA. The certificate must now be in the Schedule format with Part A and Part B, and must accompany the record each time it is produced.

What is Section 27 Evidence Act in BSA?

It is the proviso to Section 23 BSA, which admits the part of an accused’s information that leads to discovery of a fact.

Which section of BSA deals with dying declaration?

Section 26(a) BSA, corresponding to Section 32(1) of the old Act.

What is Section 45 Evidence Act in BSA?

Section 39(1) BSA on expert opinion. It now also covers experts in “any other field”.

Which section of BSA deals with estoppel?

Section 121 BSA, which corresponds to Section 115 of the Evidence Act.

Does the old Evidence Act apply to pending cases?

Under Section 170 BSA, proceedings pending before 1 July 2024 are saved. Courts have generally continued to apply the old Act to trials already underway on that date.

Preparing for AIBE, judiciary and CLAT PG? The new criminal laws are tested heavily. Lexfolio mock tests and notes explain every answer, with old and new section numbers side by side.

Free All India CLAT Open Mock, 15 November  |  Free CLAT PG mock  |  All notes and tests

Quick quiz

Q1. Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act corresponds to which BSA section?

  1. Section 61
  2. Section 62
  3. Section 65
  4. Section 63
Show answer

Answer: D. Section 63 BSA governs admissibility of electronic records and the Schedule certificate.

Q2. The rule in old Section 27 (discovery of fact) is now:

  1. The proviso to Section 23 BSA
  2. Section 27 BSA
  3. Section 22 BSA
  4. Section 24 BSA
Show answer

Answer: A. It became a proviso to Section 23, which bars confessions to police.

Q3. Presumption as to dowry death (Section 113B IEA) is now:

  1. Section 117 BSA
  2. Section 118 BSA
  3. Section 119 BSA
  4. Section 120 BSA
Show answer

Answer: B. Section 118 BSA. Section 117 is the presumption on abetment of suicide by a married woman.

Q4. Which old provision has no counterpart in the BSA?

  1. Section 165 (Judge’s power to put questions)
  2. Section 133 (accomplice)
  3. Section 166 (power of jury or assessors to put questions)
  4. Section 154 (hostile witness)
Show answer

Answer: C. Section 166 was dropped because jury trials no longer exist. Section 165 is now Section 168 BSA.

Q5. In Pune Bar Association v. Union of India (2026), the Supreme Court held that Part B of the Section 63 certificate:

  1. Must be signed only by a Section 79A IT Act notified examiner
  2. Is optional for private parties
  3. Can be replaced by an affidavit
  4. May be signed by a person the court accepts as an expert under Section 39
Show answer

Answer: D. The Court upheld Section 63(4) and held that a court-accepted expert in computer science and cyber forensics may sign Part B.

Sources

  • The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), Gazette of India
  • Ministry of Home Affairs and State police comparison tables: BSA and Indian Evidence Act
  • Pune Bar Association v. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 599 of 2026 (Supreme Court)
  • Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014); Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020), Supreme Court of India

This page is for education and general information, not legal advice for a specific case.

Get one free MCQ every morning on Telegram

Join @lexfolio_in

Useful books for this topic

As an Amazon Associate, Lexfolio earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are shown on Amazon.

Free CLAT PG 2027 sample: exam guide + 2 judgment passages

Get our 16 page CLAT PG starter free: the 2027 pattern, how to read judgment passages fast, the 25 key Supreme Court judgments of 2026, and two practice passages with 10 explained questions. Plus new free guides and law updates by email. Unsubscribe any time.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *