A fashion print or garment design can be protected in India by copyright (automatic, from creation) or by design registration under the Designs Act, 2000 (only on registration, for 10 years, extendable by 5). The trap is s.15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957: if a design could have been registered but was not, its copyright ends once an article bearing it has been reproduced more than 50 times by an industrial process. So a designer whose unregistered print goes into mass production may lose protection altogether. The safeguard is simple: register the design before production, and keep dated records of your original artwork.
| Point | Position |
|---|---|
| Copyright in original artwork | Automatic from creation; no registration needed (Copyright Act, 1957) |
| Design protection | Only on registration under the Designs Act, 2000 |
| Term of a registered design | 10 years from registration, extendable once by 5 years |
| The fifty-copies rule | Copyright Act s.15(2): copyright in a registrable but unregistered design ceases once more than 50 articles are made by an industrial process |
| Test the courts apply | Cryogas Equipment v. Inox India (Supreme Court, April 2025): two-pronged test |
| Copied fabric prints | Rajesh Masrani v. Tahiliani Design (Delhi HC, 2008): original prints protected as artistic works |
| Mass-produced unregistered garments | Ritika v. Biba Apparels (Delhi HC, 2016): copyright had ceased; suit failed |
Two laws, one design
- Copyright Act, 1957. Protects original artistic works, such as a painting, a drawing or a hand-drawn print, automatically from the moment they are created.
- Designs Act, 2000. Protects the shape, configuration, pattern or ornament applied to an article by an industrial process, judged by the eye. Protection exists only once the design is registered with the Controller of Designs. It lasts 10 years from registration and can be extended once for a further 5 years, so 15 years at most. It must be new and not publicly disclosed before filing.
The two meet at s.15 of the Copyright Act. Section 15(1) says there is no copyright in a design registered under the Designs Act. Section 15(2) deals with designs that could have been registered but were not: copyright in such a design “shall cease as soon as any article to which the design has been applied has been reproduced more than fifty times by an industrial process” by the owner or with the owner’s licence.
How the courts apply the rule
- Rajesh Masrani v. Tahiliani Design (Delhi High Court, Division Bench, 2008). Fabric prints from a well-known designer’s collection were copied. The court upheld an interim injunction, treating the original prints as artistic works protected by copyright.
- Ritika Private Limited v. Biba Apparels (Delhi High Court, 2016). The plaintiff, the label of a well-known designer, claimed copyright in prints and garments that had not been registered as designs and had already been produced in quantities well beyond 50. The court held that copyright had ceased under s.15(2), and the suit failed. The original drawing may keep copyright as an artwork, but the industrially produced garment does not.
- Cryogas Equipment Private Limited v. Inox India Limited (Supreme Court, April 2025, 2025 INSC 483). The Supreme Court laid down a two-pronged approach to s.15(2). First, is the work a purely artistic work entitled to copyright, or a design derived from an artistic work and applied to an article by an industrial process? Second, if it does not qualify for copyright, apply the functional utility test to find its dominant purpose and decide whether it qualifies for protection under the Designs Act.
Learn this properly, with a certificate. The course includes a module on protecting creative work online, from the fifty-copies rule to takedowns of copied designs on shopping sites and social media. Cyber Crime Law for Offices and Institutions, ₹599: self-paced lessons, module quizzes and a 30-question final test; pass at 60% for a verifiable Lexfolio certificate.
A real-life scenario
Ananya, a final-year design student in Bengaluru, shows her hand-drawn prints at the college show and on her portfolio. Within weeks they appear on a shopping site, mass-produced under another label at ₹499.
Her position turns on one fact: has the design already been reproduced industrially in quantity, for example by a brand she interned with, without registration?
- If her prints exist only as her own artwork and a few hand-made pieces, her copyright is strong. The copier’s mass reproduction of her artistic work is infringement, and she can seek a takedown and an injunction.
- If the prints were already applied to more than 50 garments by an industrial process with her consent, and never registered, her copyright in the design may have ceased under s.15(2). Her remaining claims would depend on the original drawings, any contract with the brand, and possibly passing off.
Note also the novelty problem. Showing a collection publicly or posting it online before filing a design application can count as prior disclosure and may defeat registration later.
Practical advice for designers and students
- Register before production. If a design is going to be applied to garments or products in quantity, file a design application before manufacturing begins and before wide public disclosure.
- Keep dated records. Save original sketches, layered digital files with their metadata, mood boards and emails sending the work to anyone. These prove authorship and the date of creation.
- Put it in writing with brands and employers. Internship, freelance and employment agreements should say who owns designs created and whether the brand may produce them. Sponsored college projects should have an IP policy too.
- Use platform takedowns first for online copies. Most marketplaces and social media platforms have intellectual property complaint forms. A copyright owner can also give written notice to an intermediary, which under the Copyright Rules, 2013 must disable access and keep it disabled for 21 days, within which the owner must produce a court order to keep it down. Platforms also have a Grievance Officer under the IT Rules, 2021.
- Go to court when it matters. For a serious, continuing copy, a suit for injunction and damages (and for passing off, where your label’s reputation is used) is the effective remedy.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to register copyright in my fashion sketches?
No. Copyright in an original artistic work is automatic. Registration only helps as evidence. The risk is s.15(2) once the design is industrially reproduced.
What exactly is the fifty-copies rule?
Under s.15(2) of the Copyright Act, copyright in a registrable but unregistered design ends once an article bearing it is reproduced more than 50 times by an industrial process by the owner or with the owner’s licence.
Can I register a design I have already posted on Instagram?
Possibly not. A design disclosed to the public before the filing date may fail the novelty requirement. Take advice before filing.
How long does design registration last?
10 years, extendable once by 5 years.
Quick quiz
Q1. Copyright in a registrable but unregistered design ceases once the article is industrially reproduced more than:
- 10 times
- 25 times
- 50 times
- 100 times
Show answer
Answer: C. Copyright Act, 1957, s.15(2).
Q2. The maximum total term of a registered design under the Designs Act, 2000 is:
- 5 years
- 10 years
- 15 years
- 60 years
Show answer
Answer: C. 10 years, extendable once by 5 years.
Q3. Which case laid down the two-pronged test for s.15(2)?
- Ritika v. Biba Apparels
- Cryogas Equipment v. Inox India
- Shreya Singhal v. Union of India
- Rajesh Masrani v. Tahiliani Design
Show answer
Answer: B. The Supreme Court in Cryogas Equipment v. Inox India, 2025 INSC 483.
For a short course on personal online fraud safety, see the Cyber Fraud Safety certificate course (₹299). For design institutions and their staff: Cyber Crime Law for Offices and Institutions, ₹599. These are certificates of completion, not professional qualifications.
Sources
- Copyright Act, 1957: ss.15(1), 15(2), 52(1)(c)
- Copyright Rules, 2013: Rule 75
- Designs Act, 2000: ss.2(d), 4, 11
- Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
- Cryogas Equipment Private Limited v. Inox India Limited, 2025 INSC 483 (Supreme Court)
- Rajesh Masrani v. Tahiliani Design Private Limited, AIR 2009 Del 44 (Division Bench, 2008)
- Ritika Private Limited v. Biba Apparels Private Limited, Delhi High Court, 2016
This page is for education and general information, not legal advice for a specific case. Law as on 29 October 2026.
Useful books for this topic
- Bare acts of the new criminal laws (BNS, BNSS, BSA)
- Code of Civil Procedure bare act
- Legal drafting and conveyancing books
- Constitution of India (coat pocket edition)
As an Amazon Associate, Lexfolio earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are shown on Amazon.
Leave a Reply