AI prompts for legal drafting work when you give the tool the facts and the law and forbid it from adding anything. A good prompt names the document, the reader, the anonymised facts, the sections you have already checked, the jurisdiction and current law, and ends with a guardrail: do not invent facts, sections, cases, dates or amounts, and list every assumption. The advocate who signs still reviews every line, because Indian courts hold the signatory responsible, not the software.
| Point | Position |
|---|---|
| What AI does well in drafting | Structure, headings, plain paragraphs from your facts, tightening language, spotting inconsistencies |
| What you must decide | Strategy, facts, law, forum, relief and the final text |
| Client details | Use placeholders like [Client] and [Amount] unless the tool is approved for confidential use |
| Law in the prompt | Supply checked sections yourself; never ask the tool to recall them |
| Never take from AI | Limitation, court fee, stamp duty, registration, pecuniary jurisdiction |
| Current law to state | BNS, BNSS and BSA from 1 July 2024; four Labour Codes from 21 November 2025 |
| Who is responsible | The advocate who signs or files (Pooja Ramesh Singh v. J&K Bank, SC, 2 July 2026) |
The anatomy of good AI prompts for legal drafting
- Role and reader: “Act as an experienced Indian litigation drafter. The reader is [a District Consumer Commission / the opposite party].”
- Document and purpose: “Draft a legal notice demanding refund of a security deposit.”
- Facts, anonymised: a numbered list with dates and amounts.
- Law you supply: “Rely only on these provisions, which I have checked: [Act, section, one-line summary]. Add no case law.”
- Jurisdiction and current law: “Indian law; state: [State].”
- Format and tone: “Formal Indian English, numbered paragraphs, under two pages, firm but not abusive.”
- Guardrail: “Do not invent facts, citations, dates or amounts. Mark missing details as [PLACEHOLDER].”
- Output check: “After the draft, list every assumption you made.”
The last two lines matter most. They turn the tool’s habit of filling gaps into visible brackets you can fix. Example: Vikram, an advocate in Lucknow, asks for a refund notice for a ₹60,000 deposit. The draft quietly adds “interest at 18% per annum”, which the client never claimed. Because he asked for an assumptions list, the tool flags it and he deletes it before the notice goes out under his name.
A standard guardrail line to paste every time
“Indian law. The BNS, BNSS and BSA are in force from 1 July 2024 and the four Labour Codes from 21 November 2025. Do not invent facts, sections, cases, dates or amounts. Mark anything uncertain as [UNVERIFIED] and missing details as [PLACEHOLDER]. After the output, list all assumptions.”
This one paragraph stops the two commonest errors: repealed law (IPC s.420 instead of BNS s.318; Payment of Gratuity Act instead of the Code on Social Security, 2020) and invented detail.
Learn this properly, with a certificate. Module 3 of this course gives worked prompts for notices, replies, agreements, written submissions, case summaries and chronologies, with a twelve-point review checklist, and Module 6 adds a 20-prompt library. AI for Lawyers and Law Students: Research, Drafting and Ethics, ₹499: self-paced lessons, module quizzes and a 30-question final test; pass at 60% for a verifiable Lexfolio certificate.
Five worked AI prompts for legal drafting in India
1. Legal notice. “Draft a legal notice on behalf of [Client] to [Opposite Party] under Indian law. Facts: [1, 2, 3]. Demand: [demand] within [days]. Provisions I have checked: [list]. Add no other law. Numbered paragraphs, under two pages.” Then check the noticee’s exact name and address, and any statutory notice rule; a cheque bounce notice under s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has fixed timing and content that you must confirm in the Act.
2. Reply to a notice. “Draft a reply to the notice dated [date] alleging [a, b, c]. Instructions: [admit / deny / explain each]. Make no admission beyond these. Deny all else. List any allegation you could not match to my instructions.”
3. Agreement. “Draft a [leave and licence / service / NDA] agreement for [State], India. Terms: [term, fee, payment, termination, deposit, dispute resolution]. Use defined terms. Do not state stamp duty or registration; write [CHECK STAMP DUTY AND REGISTRATION UNDER STATE LAW].”
4. Written submissions. “Using only these verified authorities and paragraphs [list], draft issue-wise submissions: proposition, authority, paragraph, application to facts. Add no other case.” Afterwards compare every case name and paragraph against your list; tools sometimes slip one in.
5. List of dates. “From the material below, prepare a table: Date; Event; Document and page. Use only dates in the material. Write [DATE UNCLEAR] where unsure. Do not infer.” Check each row: tools often read 04/05 in the American month-first way.
The review checklist before anything leaves your desk
- Parties: names, addresses and designations exactly as in documents.
- Facts, dates and amounts: match instructions; words and figures agree.
- Law: every section opened on India Code in current form.
- Cases: every authority opened and read at the cited paragraph.
- Forum, limitation and fees: computed by you from the statute and rules.
- Relief: nothing demanded that the client did not ask for.
- Tone: firm, no defamatory lines, no threats beyond lawful remedies.
- Leftovers: search for “[“, “insert”, “assume” and “as an AI”.
- Confidentiality: no other client’s details carried over from an earlier chat or precedent.
For Hindi drafts, have someone fluent in court Hindi read terms such as “vaad”, “pratyuttar” and “shapath patra”, and confirm that section numbers and dates survived translation.
Frequently asked questions
What are the best AI prompts for legal drafting in India?
The best AI prompts for legal drafting give the tool anonymised facts and checked law, state the jurisdiction and current statutes, fix the format, and forbid invention. End every prompt by asking the tool to list its assumptions and placeholders so that gaps become visible.
Can ChatGPT draft a legal notice in India?
It can produce a usable first draft if you supply the facts and the provisions. You must still check the noticee’s details, the demand period, any statutory notice requirement and every section before signing, because the advocate is responsible for the notice.
Is it safe to put client names in an AI drafting prompt?
Not unless the tool’s terms and settings allow confidential use and the client has agreed where needed. Use placeholders such as [Client] and add real details yourself at the end.
Can AI calculate stamp duty or court fees?
Do not rely on it. Stamp duty, registration and court fees depend on state law and rules that tools often get wrong. Mark them as placeholders and compute them yourself from the applicable state statute.
Quick quiz
Q1. The safest way to stop AI inventing law in a draft is to:
- Ask it to be confident
- Ask for many judgments
- Supply verified provisions and forbid additions
- Give no facts
Show answer
Answer: C. Giving the tool the law keeps it to language and structure.
Q2. A 2026 maintenance draft cites “section 125 CrPC”. The reviewer should change it to:
- BNS s.125
- BNSS s.144
- BSA s.132
- BNS s.318
Show answer
Answer: B. Maintenance of wife, children and parents is now under BNSS s.144.
Q3. Why ask the tool to list its assumptions?
- Courts require it
- To expose invented facts or demands
- To lengthen the draft
- So the tool can file it
Show answer
Answer: B. An assumptions list surfaces gaps the tool filled on its own.
Practise these prompts in the AI for Lawyers and Law Students course, ₹499, and learn drafting from the ground up in Legal Drafting: Notices, Affidavits, Applications and Agreements, ₹499.
Sources
- Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd., Supreme Court, 2 July 2026, 2026 INSC 668
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, s.318; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, s.144
- Code on Social Security, 2020, Chapter V (gratuity), in force 21 November 2025
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, s.138
- Bar Council of India Rules, Part VI, Chapter II, Rules 17 and 24 (client confidence)
This page is for education and general information, not legal advice for a specific case. Law as on 31 October 2026.
Useful books for this topic
- Bare acts of the new criminal laws (BNS, BNSS, BSA)
- Code of Civil Procedure bare act
- Legal drafting and conveyancing books
- Constitution of India (coat pocket edition)
As an Amazon Associate, Lexfolio earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are shown on Amazon.
Leave a Reply